Estimate your ROI

Hours saved, wait days eliminated, and £ avoided — based on your team's size, defect baseline, and current way of working. Live calculation

Annual £ Saved

£0

Productivity + shift-left

Hours Saved / yr

Across all roles

Wait Days Saved

Portfolio elapsed

Payback

—

Months

Cumulative Net Benefit over Project Timeline Months 0 → 48 · live calculation

@ 12 Months

£0

Savings: — · Cost: —

—

@ 24 Months

£0

Savings: — · Cost: —

—

@ 48 Months

£0

Savings: — · Cost: —

—

Quick start — pick a persona Loaded: Mid-size product team

Picking a persona populates every yellow field below. Edit any one to model your scenario.

A. Team composition▾

BAs / POs / Tech-spec leadsPrimary REQQA usersFTE

Senior DevelopersAffected by rework avoidanceFTE

QA / Test EngineersFTE

Automation EngineersAffected by STORYTELLERFTE

Architects / Regulatory AffairsFTE

B. Loaded hourly rates▾

BA / PO loaded rate£/hr

Senior Developer loaded rate£/hr

QA loaded rate£/hr

Automation Engineer loaded rate£/hr

Architect / RA loaded rate£/hr

Blended consult rate£/hr

Annual paid hours per FTE240 days × 7.5 hrshrs/yr

C. Workload volume▾

Applications in scopeapps

Requirements per app per yearreqs/app

Stories per requirementstories

Analysis cycles per requirementcycles

Releases per yearreleases

Regulatory audits per yearaudits

D. Defect baseline & phase costs▾

Defects detected — Unit testing/yr

Defects detected — Integration/yr

Defects detected — System/yr

Defects detected — UAT/yr

Defects detected — Production/yr

Cost — Requirements phase£/defect

Cost — Unit testing£/defect

Cost — Integration testing£/defect

Cost — System testing£/defect

Cost — UAT£/defect

Cost — Production£/defect

E. Current-state time on task▾

% BA/PO time on requirements authoringdecimal

% BA/PO time reviewing requirementsdecimal

Manual review meeting sizepeople

Manual review hrs/cycle (per attendee)hrs

Manual story authoring hrs/Gherkin storyhrs/story

Manual trace-matrix hrs per audithrs

F. REQQA improvement factors▾

% reduction in authoring timedecimal

% reduction in review meeting hoursdecimal

Assisted story authoring hrs/storyhrs/story

% defects shifted leftdecimal

% reqs containing latent ambiguitydecimal

REQQA catch rate on ambiguous reqsdecimal

Wasted dev hrs per escaped ambiguous reqhrs

AI dev velocity multiplier×

REQQA-assisted trace-matrix hrs/audithrs

G. Wait time / lead time▾

Manual review-cycle elapsed daysdays

REQQA review-cycle elapsed daysdays

% releases that are revenue-producingdecimal

Revenue per release per day-saved£/day

H. REQQA investment▾

Annual REQQA licence£/yr

One-off implementation / training£

Annual AI / API token cost£/yr

Discount rate (NPV)decimal

Annual £ Saved

£0

incl. revenue uplift: £0

Total Hours Saved / yr

~0 FTE-years equivalent

3-Year ROI

—

3-yr cumulative net: £0

Breakdown by frame

Savings frame	Hours / yr	£ / yr
1. Requirements authoring	0	£0
2. Review-meeting reduction	0	£0
3. Story generation	0	£0
5. AI-era rework avoidance	0	£0
7. Regulatory documentation	0	£0
Productivity total	0	£0
Cost avoidance
4. Defect shift-left	—	£0
Wait time / revenue
6a. Calendar days saved	0 days	—
6b. Revenue uplift	—	£0
GRAND TOTAL — Annual £ saved	—	£0

Cost & ROI

Year-1 cost	£0
Year 2 / 3 cost	£0
Year-1 net benefit	£0
3-year cumulative net	£0
3-year NPV	£0
Payback period	—

How to read these numbers: defaults reflect a vendor-baseline view. The most-leveraged inputs are % review reduction, % defects shifted left, and AI velocity multiplier.